As Zelizer cards, taboos are present up against sex to own get
Sweden, situated in north Europe, is home to ten mil people, making it one particular populated country into the Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and you will Sweden) and also in the fresh European Nordic Part (Scandinavia also Finland and you may Iceland). Originating in the late 90s, Sweden became the worldwide chief in the fight against prostitution, making the country well-known regarding the books and you may discussion about sex really works.
In this part, I identify how the Swedish model features diffused throughout the world. I explain the rules (that is now two decades old) while the feminist thought that supported the first laws. Then i synopsis the three ages ot fieldwork that i carried out in Sweden. step one questioned a dozen trick informants (personal specialists, activists, a therapist, and you may a good sexologist) in two of one’s around three major Swedish urban centers (Stockholm and you may Malmo), along with Oslo (Norway) and Helsinki (Finland) examine different countries and expertise. The conclusion summarizes a portion of the performance ot my personal search.
It is important to understand the environment in Sweden with respect to research on pros- titution/sex really works. This issue is so sensitive that it seems impossible for the average person to have a neutral approach to it. Everyone must stand in favor of or against the legislation. And the words used to frame the discussions matter a great deal. The Swedish law uses the terms prostitution and prostitute, not sex work and sex staff member. The government and those who support the legislation use the word prostitution, while those who wish to overturn the legislation use the term sex personnel. For example, Swedish government institutions, such as local authorities and health services providers, use the word prostitution, but the two Swedish associations that fight tor the rights of the country’s sex workers (Fuckforbundet and Rose Alliance; see Figures 31.1 and 31.2) use the term sex really works. 1 learned from my fieldwork that using the correct words with the people who live and work in Sweden is important. Indeed, some social workers or activists refused to talk with me because 1 used the “wrong” word with them; because the legislation is so controversial, few people believe that you are a neutral researcher who wants to study prostitution or sex escorts Leverkusen work from an academic point of view. Attempting to
Figure 29.step one People with yellow umbrellas (symbolic of brand new sex workers’ legal rights course) towards the Fuckforbundet drifts when you look at the EuroPride Parade inside the Stockholm on the .
To learn the consequences of the Swedish rules toward life and on the work regarding men sex specialists, step 1 interviewed 25 men sex pros who do work from inside the Sweden
be as neutral as possible, some researchers and social workers have used the term sex for payment. Unfortunately, the phrase just sounds awkward to those who hear it and who want to know your position on the issue.
To maintain a neutral position, in this chapter 1 use both terms, in alphabetical order with a slash in between: prostitution /sex really works or prostitute/sex staff member. Before exploring the details of the Swedish legislation, it is important to understand the feminists thought that has framed the prostitution/sex work debate.
Profile 29.2 This new Fuckforbundet floats regarding a road-height check for the EuroPride Procession into the Stockholm for the . Sex specialists and you will allies to the drifts display the assistance to have sex workers’ legal rights into the Sweden.
Due to space limitations, I offer two key elements of the debate: the different ideas regarding prostitution/sex work (as presented by Zelizer, 2005) and feminist thought on this topic (Scou- lar, 2004). The aim of Zelizer s book, The acquisition from Intimacy, is to analyze “the relationship between everyday practices and legal disputes when it comes to intimate economic interactions” (p. 1). It is commonly believed that “intimacy corrupts economy and the economy corrupts intimacy. Yet . . . people often mingle economic activity with intimacy. The two often sustain each other” (p. 1).